Garden School:


Garden School:
Teaching this week: Biting the bullet: when to be brave, and to rip out existing garden features, in a garden which is not giving the owner any joy!

Sunday, 13 September 2015

Pruning a weeping pear/willow

I've been asked about this several times, and it's one of those jobs that is easy to demonstrate, almost impossible to describe.

However, I will try!

This technique applies to small ornamental weeping trees, usually either willow or pear - Salix caprea 'Kilmarnock',  or willow-leaved pear, Pyrus salicifolia 'Pendula'. Both of these are usually grafted trees, where the ornamental weeping foliage is grafted onto the top of a short upright trunk.

This leads to two problems: shoots sprouting vertically from ground level, and overcrowded tops.

Shoots sprouting from the bottom are easily explained and easily dealt with. They are shoots from the original, non-weeping, rootstock, which are usually very vigorous, and must be removed as soon as you see them.

In a perfect world, you will spot them as soon as they are tiny green items on the lower trunk, in which case you remove them by pulling them sharply downwards, away from the trunk. Don't cut them: cutting will promote regrowth, the idea is to pull away the base of the shoot thus removing the area producing growth hormones, so it won't regrow.

(One of my Clients swears by wiping saliva on the ripped-off area, saying that the enzymes in our saliva kill these growth hormones. I'll let you decide whether to try it or not!)

In a less-than-perfect world, you didn't notice them until they were a foot and half long, in which case you have no option but to cut them off. Cut cleanly, with secateurs, as close to the trunk as you can, and keep an eye on the cuts as they will almost definitely re-sprout from that point. As soon as they do, rip the new growth off.

New shoots coming up from underground, near to the trunk, should also be dealt with as soon as you see them - again, don't cut them unless you really have to - try to clear away the soil until you can see the point of attachment, then rip them sharply away from the trunk or root.  If all else fails you will have to cut them, but again you will then have to keep an eye on them for regrowth, and deal with the new shoots as soon as you see them.

Now we move up the trunk to the top.

The principle is to aim for a "light airy waterfall" effect. If yours is more like one of the shaggier muppets on a stick, then it is time to remove some unwanted foliage.

As with nearly all tree work, start with the three Ds: dead, diseased and damaged.

That means, go over the whole mop head, removing any branches which are obviously dead, ie with no leaves growing on them: branches which are diseased - ie fungus, pustules or other nasty things growing on them - or damaged, ie where two branches have rubbed against each other, damaging their bark. Cut out one or the other of rubbing branches - the worst damaged one, or the smaller of the two.

Usually, this will leave you with a massive pile of dead sticks on the lawn, and a significant improvement in the look of your weeping tree.

Now we can tackle the live foliage: there are three elements to this part of the work - balance, length, and thickness.

Firstly, step back and assess the overall shape of the tree. It is fairly balanced, left to right? Move round a quarter turn, and look again, to check if it is balanced front to back. This will show you where to make your first proper pruning cuts, in order to get it level.

Next, look at the distance above the ground - do any of the branches sweep the ground? If they do, they are too long and will have to be shortened. Aim to have all branches swinging clear of the ground: how far clear will depend on the size of the tree, but as a rough guide I like to have mine at least a foot clear of the ground.

Lastly, look at the top of the tree - is it still a dense mass, or can you now see through it? If it is still a dense mass, you will have to thin out the top.

Right, now we move on to the actual pruning! You can do it in any order, but I always do the thinning out of the top first, otherwise you might waste time beautifully pruning lower branches, then realise that you have just removed the whole branch. Then I do the balance pruning, to get it equal left-to-right, and equal front-to-back, then lastly I do the length pruning.

I use sharp secateurs for most of the work, and a small pruning saw for thinning out the top part, where the branches can be quite substantial.

All cuts are made to the same principle, and this is the only "technical" bit that you have to learn - again, it is much easier to show than to explain, but I'll try.

When cutting any weeping tree, always cut out the "underneath" growth, leaving a branch or twig that is "springing" up in the right direction.

Here's a photo showing a branch that has been poorly pruned: the owner just wanted to make it shorter (it's a full-size weeping pear, not a miniature one) so they cut off the branch at random, leaving an ugly stump and a down-ward growing branch.

The red line indicates the correct place to cut - immediately below a branch that is "springing" upwards.

If you haven't done this before, it can make it easier if you duck inside the canopy of the tree, then you can more clearly see which branches are springing away from you, and which part of the branch is growing straight downwards.

This is how you make every single cut, regardless of where it is on the tree: always cut just below an outward springing branch.

So, first job, thin the top: duck back inside the canopy, and work your way round the tree, taking out maybe three or four largish branches, the ones growing at the innermost part of the canopy. The idea is to keep the outer, freshest, growth, and to lose the congested old inner growth.

Once you have removed a couple of main branches, it should be a lot less congested, and you can step outside the tree to re-assess the balance: did your thinning solve those problems? If not, shorten the branches that are out of place.

Then, take a look at the length of the remaining branches, and trim any that are too long.

By always cutting the underneath growth, you will not spoil the outline of the tree: you will not remove the freshest outside growth, just the tired inner growth: and you won't end up with a terrible "pudding-basin" haircut, but will have a natural, slightly uneven lower hem.


There is one further problem you might encounter with these weeping trees: small branches that spring up vertically, ruining the outline.

Sometimes people leave them in the hope that as they grow heavier, they will eventually "weep" but in my experience they rarely do, and the tend to spoil the look of the tree for months in the meantime, so they are best pruned off, very close indeed to the branch.

Here's an example of one (right), and the red line indicates where you should cut it.

Here is one I did earlier, as they say. This is what it looked like before I started - not too bad, as I was the one who pruned it the previous year, and you can still just about see through it, but it had grown a bit wayward so the owner called me back for an annual tidy-up.

There weren't any major branches to come out this time, just a few of the side branches to be removed.

Most of the branches were lying on the ground, so I went all the way round shortening them.

Then I went over what was left, removing all the many upward-and-outward shoots.


Here is the result, which is much neater and yet which still looks natural.

So much better than running the hedgetrimmer over it...



 

 

Did you enjoy this article? Did you find it useful? Would you like me to answer your own, personal, gardening question? Become a Patron - just click here - and support me! Or use the Donate button for a one-off donation. If just 10% of my visitors gave me a pound a month, I'd be able to spend a lot more time answering all the questions!!

25 comments:

  1. Can you tell us what is the best time of year to trim the weeping pear? Ours is some twenty feet high.
    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oops! Sorry, I missed your question, please don't think that I'm ignoring you!

    The answer is that it's usually best to do it in winter - the tree is dormant then, and won't notice, plus with no leaves in the way, you can really see the dead wood (it's usually a very pale brown and looks very dry)clearly, plus you can see the "form" or shape of the tree, which helps you to decide which branches must go, and which can stay.

    If you are not too sure about which branches are dead, then it can be easier to do it about now - mid May - when leaf growth has started, so you can easily see which branches are dead. Although it's then a bit harder to assess the general outline.

    If all else fails, "do it when you have time!"

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have a Weeping pussy willow (pendula, salix caprea) that was only to grow 5-6' tall but is closer to 8-9' tall. How can I get it back to the 5-6 foot size I wanted or can I.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Larry,

    Two issues here: firstly, the reason the cultivar "Kilmarnock" is so popular is that it doesn't grow any higher than when you buy it. It gets thicker in the trunk, the branches get longer (until they lie on the ground!) and thicker, the tree itself can often get wider, but no higher. This is because the weeping part is grafted onto a non-weeping trunk: and branches of trees don't "rise" with time - otherwise all those childhood swings would end up being ten foot off the ground!

    If the tree you bought is a pendular Salix caprea but not a grafted one, then it is like a "normal" tree and will continue to grow until it achieves its natural height. If you attempt to trim it, you will probably spoil the lovely pendular effect.

    The second issue is, did it really say 5-6' (feet) tall? Or was it 5-6m (metres) tall, in which case it will get three times as big as you had hoped. If it's any consolation, I was caught out the same way ten years ago: I bought a Silver Birch for my tiny back garden, I would have sworn the label said 10' high after ten years, but it's now higher than the house and clearly going for 30' high...

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have a 4 year old Kilmarnock Willow that has great sentimental value but has not been pruned since planting, as I don't want to do anything to kill it. The branches now extend around 4 to 5 feet over the ground, so about half of each branch is on the ground. When should I cut them back and should I cut them back to ground level in one go, or remove a small amount and then wait before removing more?

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh dear! *laughs* The branches definitely should not be trailing along the ground, so you will have to be brave and do a little bit of light pruning. It would be easier for me to answer this question in a new post - could you email me some photos of it, please?

      Delete
  6. I have bought several weeping silver pears and two of the five look sick 5 days after planting; their leaves are browning...help!

    ReplyDelete
  7. John, it is the end of January, therefore it's pretty much the middle of winter, so it is not surprising that they are losing leaves: they may very well have been imported from a warmer country, and/or kept in polytunnels, so this could just be the shock of going outside. Or, it could be the "shock" of being planted out, which does sometimes happen.

    I would suggest that you take photos of them now, to remind you of how the browning is progressing, and take photos every week or two, so that you have a record of it.

    Keep the receipt!!

    If, when spring arrives properly, you don't see signs of new buds and new leaves, then it might be that some of them have died, in which case contact the supplier: they should give you a replacement, although they will usually ask you to bring back the entire dead plant, roots and all, so don't chop them down: if you are satisfied that they are quite dead, dig up the whole thing and take it/them back with the receipt.

    If the supplier is a fair distance away, you could email them with photos and ask their advice: I would think they will say very much the same - give them a chance to settle down, and wait for spring before declaring

    ReplyDelete
  8. Best instructions I have ever seen on how to prune prunus salicifolia. Many thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Really useful practical advice and the photos with the cutting lines are a real help . Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  10. I have a mature weeping pear that is probably over 30 years old. I am concerned as the bark is peeling off. Is it dying?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bark peeling off is never a good sign.... but some trees seem to cling on for years, even with badly damaged bark.

      If you'd care to email me some photos of the tree, I could make a more intelligent response?

      Delete
  11. Our inherited weeping pear is quite old and has grown outwards and has a spread too large for the size of the garden. We love the tree. Can we cut it right back to the thicker ‘main’ branches? Will the tree survive and sprout new growth or will this Kill the tree?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It would be helpful if you could email me a picture or two of the tree?

      Delete
    2. Cathy sent me some pictures - to read all about it, go to this article:
      https://rachel-the-gardener.blogspot.com/2020/09/weeping-pear-cathy-has-big-one.html

      Delete
  12. Hi Rachel

    I planted a weeping pear at my old house but was never around long enough to watch it mature. Now I’ve got a garden again, I’d love to plant a new one but need to keep the height down to avoid blocking a view. Do you know if they can be easily restricted to say 8 or 10 foot in height with the right pruning?
    Stu

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Stu,

      As they are usually grafted trees, then yes!! You can buy one that's just the right height.

      The trick is to make sure you buy a grafted one: ask the staff at the nursery to confirm that it's grafted (find the oldest member of staff, and don't bother asking any Saturday staff because they probably won't know the difference), and make sure they understand that you want a grafted one to prevent it growing too tall.

      Hope you find one!

      Rachel

      Delete
  13. I planted a weeping pear two years ago and it is thriving. Now that it is nearly the height I want, do I crop of the top branches? Thanks so much

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi there:

      As mentioned in the article, grafted weeping trees won't get any taller than when you buy them: they get fatter, and denser, but the main stem doesn't grow any higher.

      If there are branches sticking directly upwards, shooting for the moon, then yes, you can cut those ones off: cut them as near to the thick "main" branch as you can, to avoid having short stubby bits sticking out and ruining the outline.

      If you'd like to send me a couple of photos of the tree, I'd be happy to offer an opinion on it!

      Delete
  14. Hi Rachel just wondering can you shape this tree... not keen on 'weeping' effect would rather it stay minimal with majority of growth up top as we have bedding scrubs to either side of it! see a lot online that look like lollipop shape and other than looks wild and overgrown! thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unfortunately, if you have bought a weeping tree, then it is always going to have the "weeping" form. You could keep pruning back the branches, I suppose: if you kept them very short, say 2-3' in length (depending on the proportion of your particular tree)then you would achieve the lollipop shape which you mention, which would, at least, allow more room for the bedding and shrubs around it.

      But really, if you don't like the weeping form, then you might as well dig up the tree and throw it away. *sighs* Harsh but honest! There comes a point where you have to say to yourself "this is our garden, and we just don't like that tree!"

      Delete
    2. Hi Rachel...thanks! at the moment it's tall about 4/5ft...with branches starting about a foot up from the soil, each no more than 6-8inches (with the longest being at the top). The garden centre had told us we could cut off the lower branches if they effected the bed. it's not that I don't like that the branches will weep, I just don't want a big shrub, which this breed looks like in most pictures, the branches fall to the base... i'd rather it look like a tree, eg.see the trunk :) so wondering could you maintain/control its shape?

      Delete
    3. Aha, more information! Yes, the garden centre have advised you correctly: you can trim off all the lower branches in order to get a clear stem.

      And as for keeping the top branches shorter, yes you can: if you go to the Search box at the very top left of the page, type in Kilmarnock. That will take you to a number of articles about Salix Kilmarnock, which has similar issues: and there's a lot of advice there about how to prune a weeping tree in order to retain the form, but shorten the branches!

      Delete

Comments take 2 days to appear: please be patient. Please note that I do not allow any comments containing links: this is not me being controlling, or suppression of free speech: it is purely to prevent SPAM - I get a continual stream of fake comments with links to horrible things. Trust me, you don't want to read them....