Thursday, 14 February 2013

Renovating an overgrown Hazel

Hazel - familiar to all of us for the catkins in spring, and the nuts in autumn. Due to those naughty, naughty squirrels, the nuts are often buried in our flowerbeds, leaving us with surprise Hazel trees in later years.

In many cases, the seedlings go un-noticed until they are quite well established, and then - I hate to say this, but I've seen it so often that I know it to be true - it often happens that they are beheaded at ground level by the garden owner, or by a lazy gardener, instead of being dug out properly.

Now, this happens more often that I would like: usually with persistent self-seeders, such as Ash, Sycamore, Hawthorn and Blackthorn. This leaves the roots undamaged, allowing quicker and thicker re-growth of the top. And then they say to the gardener (me) "Oh, could you just pull those little seedlings out," unaware that the so-called seedling actually has a five-year-old root system, and now takes a fork and a serious excavation to remove it.

Humph.

Anyway, back to the Hazel - when beheading happens to a Hazel, be it lazy, accidental, or on purpose, the result is basically a coppice. Coppicing is an ancient woodland management system: suitable trees were chopped at ankle height (or at waist or head height, when it's called Pollarding, but it's the same principle) to promote the growth of lots and lots of smaller stems, rather than the traditional single trunk.

Walk around any woodland, or parkland, and you will find coppiced Hazel, usually in groves, and - these days - usually massively overgrown.  They look like a photo of an explosion at ground level: a mass of stems, all much of a thickness, sprouting from one single point.

One of my clients has a couple of them: one was the result of ramming some "pea sticks" rather too firmly into the vegetable garden, and leaving them for a couple of years, not realising that they were Hazel and therefore (like Willow) hard to kill.

Another was planted by a squirrel, but they liked it, so they left it.

Now, it's a monstrous thing, and today I decided to tidy it up a bit.

Typically, I forgot to take a "Before" picture [memo to self: really, REALLY must remember to do that] so you'll have to take my word for it that the lower branches had spread out to the point where they obstructed the steps, and the bank. Which is currently sprouting snowdrops, and would look lovely, if only we could see it...

So I set to work with my trusty bowsaw, removing the outer layer of mostly horizontal growth.

Here's the result: a much neater shape, with the lower branches cleared away, along with some thin stragglers.


Here are some of my cuts to the base: as you can see, some of these stems are now quite substantial, they are thicker round than my wrist, but all were easy to nip off with the trusty bowsaw.

I try to cut as low down as possible, and with a slight slant to allow water to run off the cut - yes, just like when we prune roses, but on a more industrial scale.

Sometimes, as in that small one to the right, you just can't get "at" them cleanly, so that one was cut just as far down as I could reach.

And yes, I could have gone all the way back to my bag and got out the small pruning saw...  but when paid to work, there is always a calculation of Time It Takes To Get Correct Tool versus Money. And when I'm at the far end of a garden, well, sometimes I just do make do with the tools I have to hand.


This is the other side of the tree, showing some more cuts.

The steps are now clear, and we can now see the snowdrops when we come in the side gate: success!

By the way, there are two types of Hazel commonly found in the UK - Corylus avellana is the normal, common Hazel, found in woodlands, parkland, road verges, canal-side walks and so on.

The other is Corylus maxima or Filbert, which is more often found in vegetable gardens where they were deliberately planted, as they produce larger nuts.

I'm not including Contorted Hazel, which I would only expect to find in ornamental gardens, as they are very expensive to buy.  Both C. avellana and C. maxima have a "Contorta" cultivar, and I rather think that there is a red-leaved variety as well.  All of them look very interesting in winter, and hideous the rest of the year - in my opinion - as the leaves are as contorted as the stems, leaving them look as though they are suffereing from some weird disease.  *shudders*

If you really want something with contorted stems, I would always suggest going for contorted Willow instead - Salix babylonica "Tortuosa" - which has very similar stems, but has long, elegant leaves that look nice all summer through: plus it does not throw up annoying straight stems, and of course you can chop it back wildly whenever you feel like it, as it's fast-growing. And every branch that you cut off will grow: so instead of one very expensive slow-growing shrub, you get as many fast-growing but easily-manageable shrubs as you wish.

So, when out walking, if you see a tree with lots of smaller stems, instead of one trunk, very much like the one pictured above, then it is probably Hazel.  And at this time of year, it will have catkins!


Did you enjoy this article? Did you find it useful? Would you like me to answer your own, personal, gardening question? Become a Patron - just click here - and support me! Or use the Donate button for a one-off donation. If just 10% of my visitors gave me a pound a month, I'd be able to spend a lot more time answering all the questions!!

8 comments:

  1. Hi Rachel, loved this article and it made me laugh. Bind weed seems to have a similar attitude to life and death as Hazel and other self seeders, I am grateful that bindweed does not have thousands of viable seeds the roots are bad enough but I do enjoy the flowers. My partner and I have a battle going on as he roots out bindweed as soon as he spots it and I try to let some grow if the plant is not interfering with anything important. Anyway, my daughter has a tall hazel growing in her small garden planted by the previous owners 20 or more years ago that we are reluctant to remove completely and is very near a shed door so coppicing is not the answer. I wondered if a combination of pollarding and crown reduction might do the trick. Any thoughts? I do have a photo. She is in Cambridgeshire.
    Thank you for brightening my day.
    Kind Regards,
    Claire

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Claire, "Bindweed? Kill!" I'm saying no more.... *laughs*

      Do please send me a photo of your daughter's problem Hazel - the email address is in the right-hand pane, under the advert for my book (relentless self-publicity, I know: but come on, it's a great book!).

      Delete
  2. Hi Rachel, An interesting article and shame there wasn’t a ‘before’ pic - as I have one that was well established before we moved in 25 years ago and we haven’t done anything to it. It is a monster and needs a significant hatchet job - just need to be sure of how far to go (can provide a pic of the monster).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HI Dermot, yes - I know I forgot to take the 'before' picture: it's a failing of mine. I get carried away, and launch into action!

      There is another post on this topic:

      https://rachel-the-gardener.blogspot.com/2020/07/hazel-coppice-cosmetic-renovation.html

      ...which does actually have a before pic...

      In the meantime, do please feel free to email me a picture of your monster, I'd love to see it - the email address is in the right-hand pane, up towards the top of the screen. I would type it out for you here, but I'll get a shed-load of spam if I do!

      Delete
  3. Hi Rachel, tomorrow I will take the courage to work on our "bush", the original plant has been used for firewood, so it's now spread out over a more than a metre on the ground (I will share a picture) - what would you suggest I do? My plan is to remove 2/3 of all the old shoots at the ground, hopefully getting a bit more space, and work towards a single (main) tree form. Kind regards, Gijs

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Gijs,

      Your plan is a good one! Removing about 2/3rds of the shoots should thin and reduce it quite a bit.

      I am not sure if your plan to eventually reduce it to one stem, ie to regain the tree form, will give you a satisfactory result, as there will always be the mass of cut-off stumps around the base: it will never go back to being one single upright trunk.

      But it's still well worth trying - just keep taking reference photos, every time you work on it - before AND after! - so that you can check your progress.

      Good luck!

      Delete
    2. Hi Rachel,
      I think you are right, there are too many shoots to create a nice single form (we have a seedling in the nursery for this purpose), so I think I will keep it as an hollow hedge (if you know what I mean) where only some new growth is allowed. Unfortunately I can't share a before/after picture :-)

      Happy pruning, it's the season!
      Gijs

      Delete
    3. Thanks for emailing the photo, Gijs: as you say, rather a lot of shoots!

      Delete

Comments take 2 days to appear: please be patient. Please note that I do not allow any comments containing links: this is not me being controlling, or suppression of free speech: it is purely to prevent SPAM - I get a continual stream of fake comments with links to horrible things. Trust me, you don't want to read them....